FREE! Subscribe to News Fetch, THE daily wine industry briefing - Click Here


Sponsored by:
Banner_Xpur_160x600---Wine-Industry-Insight[63]
InnoVint_WII_ad_portrait

Bryant Family Vineyards case against financial consultant booted out of San Francisco court, transferred to NY

October 30, 2019 | Filed under Featured Articles | Posted by

 

Lauren Ridenhour, a former financial consultant to Donald I. Bryant Jr., and his wife, Bettina Sulser Bryant has been granted her request to have a contract dispute moved from San Francisco Federal District Court to New York federal court where Ridenhour is suing the Bryants.

 

The rest of this 494-word article and full court filings are for Wine Executive News premium subscribers.

  • Background

  • A complicated tangle of roles and responsibilities

  • San Francisco Federal Judge’s order granting Ridenhour’s motion to transfer

Premium Subscribers Log-In Here:

Previous Wine Industry Insight coverage:

 

Not a Wine Executive News Subscriber?

Subscribe to Wine Executive News now, and get the rest of this original article along with everything else on the site every day, including original documents, spreadsheets,and source materials for just $29.99 per month or $209 per year

30 full Ridenhour and Bryant litigation court documents for premium subscribers

  • San Francisco Federal Judge’s order granting Ridenhour’s motion to transfer
  • Ridenhour complaint-032219
  • Ridenhour complaint-Amended-042219
  • Ridenhour complaint-Amended-Exhibit-042219
  • Response to defendant srequest for premotion conference-060619
  • Bryant-V-Ridenhour-Complaint- 073019
  • Bryant-V-Ridenhour-Complaint-Exhibita-073019
  • Second amended complaint-Ridenhour-073119
  • Complaint amended-Exhibita-073119
  • Complaint amended-Exhibitb-073119
  • Complaint amended-Exhibitc-073119
  • Complaint amended-Exhibitd-073119
  • Complaint amended-Exhibite-073119
  • Declaration Of Bettina Sulser Bryant In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
  • Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
  • Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
  • [Proposed] (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction 1322660.1-081919
  • Declaration Of Keith J. Wesley In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
  • Order Re Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order-081920
  • Defendant-Ridenhour-Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Plaintiff-Application For A Tro-08/21/19
  • Judge order-Ex parte application for TRO-082319
  • Stipulation-On-Confidential-Information-09-03-19
  • Plaintiff’s-Bryant-Ex-Parte -Application-Etc-091119
  • Plaintiff ridenhour-Memorandum-Of-Law-In-Opposition-To-Defendantbryant-Motion-To-Dismiss-09/13/19
  • Second-Amended-Complaint-Exhibits-Ridenhour-Opposition-To-Dismissal-09/13/19
  • Order-Denying-Plaintiff-Ex-Parte-Application-091319
  • Declaration-Of-Bettina-Sulser-Bryant-Opposition-To-Defendant-Lauren-Ridenhour-Motion-To-Dismiss-Complaint-09/20/19
  • Declaration Of Pearl Zuchlewski In Opposition To Plaintiff’s Application For A Tro- 09/20/19
  • Defendant Ridenhour Reply Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint-092719
  • Defendant-Bryant-Reply Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint-092719