![]() |
![]() ALSO SPONSORED BY: ![]()
Wine Industry Insight |
![]() |
After nine months of legal jousting and pandemic delays, the Vintage Wine Estates (VWE) smoke-taint lawsuit against its insurance company is scheduled for a jury trial sometime in early 2022 in San Francisco U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Judge Maxine M. Chesney has set jury selection for Feb. 14, 2022, with the trial to begin when empaneling is complete.
A number of legal experts have privately said to Wine Industry Insight that — depending on the outcome — the case could set a significant precedent for other wineries in smoke taint disputes.
The case began in August 2019 when Vintage Wine Estates (VWE) and Kunde Enterprises, filed a joint lawsuit in Sonoma County Superior Court seeking to compel nine insurance companies to reimburse them for approximately $20 million in smoke-taint damages resulting from the 2017 October 2017 wildfires in Northern California. Kunde and Vintage Wine Estates have common shareholders with VWE CEO Pat Roney and the Leslie Rudd Trust having ownership in both. Roney is also the president of Kunde.
Case moved from Sonoma to federal court
The insurance companies involved argued successfully to have the case removed to federal court because none of them had a physical presence in the Sonoma Court’s jurisdiction. Those insurers include:
Accordingly, both VWE and Kunde filed separate individual complaints against the insurers in San Francisco Federal Court.
The Kunde case will be heard separately in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in the Oakland courtroom of Judge Jeffrey S. White. Jury Selection has been scheduled for Jan. 5, 2020. Wine Industry Insight will cover that in a separate article.
According to court documents, the main issue in both cases is when the grapes were tainted. As is standard in most winery insurance contracts, grapes damaged while still on the vine are not covered. However, once harvested, grapes are considered “in production” and are covered.
This 300-word section was redacted and is available to Wine Executive News premium Subscribers
Court documents filed by the insurers did not reveal the results of the Houston, TX-based 3D Marine lab tests, or sensory evaluations. The court filings also had no information on the qualifications of the sensory evaluators nor any certifications of the laboratory.
Court documents indicated that 3D Marine investigators interviewed the two VWE winemakers who had determined the grapes in question had no defects. The results of the interviews, according to insurer filings, were inconclusive.
According to the insurers’ court filings, 3D Marine made an additional series of requests for other data including weight tags and work orders that they say were not forthcoming — a charge that VWE disputes in its response filing.
Subscribe to Wine Executive News now, and get the rest of this original article along with everything else on the site every day, including original documents, spreadsheets, and source materials for just $29.99 per month or $209 per year an>