![]() |
![]() ALSO SPONSORED BY: ![]()
Wine Industry Insight |
![]() |
The Ohio State Attorney General (AG) has a commanding lead in the Direct Shipping legal tournament he started in July against seven companies.
Currently, The AG has racked up four clear victories, two game delays, and one contender who decided to fight on.
Charged with illegally shipping alcoholic beverages in the July 8, 2020 complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio were:
The charges followed an AG sting operation in 2019 and 2020. The sting involved employees of the Ohio Division of Liquor Control who purchased wines and spirits from the defendants’ web sites and had them shipped to the Division’s headquarters in Reynoldsburg, OH.
The shipments and deliveries were verified by records the AG obtained from Federal Express and United Parcel Service.
As noted in the chart, ShakeStir is the only defendant to contest the charges. Four have accepted plea deals. Wine.com has been granted an extension until January 22, 2021 to enter a response.
Winc had been granted an extension until Dec. 4 to respond, but according to the online PACER Federal Court Docket as of 5:48 a.m. PDT, December 16, 2020 has not yet done so.
What happens when a company blows a federal court filing deadline? Two top litigators weigh in here: Winc deadline, Part 1 and Winc deadline, Part 2.
[Redacted]
Ohio law may have a provision that could allow Winc to return legally it can qualify for an “S Permit.”
Depending upon the size of its production, Winc might be eligible because it holds a California Type 02 Winegrower’s license and makes its own wine.
The Ohio AG’s original Complaint for Injunctive Relief explains:
“[Redacted]”