|
ALSO SPONSORED BY:
Wine Industry Insight |
|
With one Napa County Official’s resignation over a shakedown behind them, the backers of a Pope Valley resort development have filed lawsuits against three members of the Napa County Board of Supervisors alleging improper, unethical and possibly illegal behavior over the the denial of the project’s use use permit.
A member of Napa County’s legal defense team told Wine Industry Insight that, “The County vigorously disputes Luciana’s allegations, and maintains that the County’s action was proper and lawful in all respects.”
The most recent development in this long-standing soap opera is the scheduling of a trustee sale to auction off Pope Valley’s historic Aetna Springs resort along with another 226 acres of the former Juliana Vineyards which had been slated for a golf course for other development. The sale has been set for 1:30 p.m., Dec. 23 on the steps of the Napa County courthouse.
MONDAVI, GETTY, OTHER HEAVYWEIGHTS SAY COUNTY ACTED IMPROPERLY
Developers William I. Cresswell and Robert Radovan — along with other heavyweight investors that included members of the Mondavi and Getty families — pulled the plug on the project in mid-June after the Napa County Supervisors overruled county planning staff and rejected the project’s use permit.( A list of investors and related parties appears at the end of this article.)
Developers sued in both federal and county courts, charging in court documents that the denial had come as a result of corruption and other unethical behavior by county officials a well as serious improprieties in the conduct of public meetings.
VIP Subscribers click here to read the complete, un-redacted article.
The full text of the following sections is available to VIP Premium Subscribers).
According to the Certification of Interested Entities of Persons filed with the U.S. District Court:
“the following listed persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities,
(i) have a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or
(ii) have a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this proceeding:
(The remainder of this section is available to VIP Premium Subscribers)
Subscribe now, and get the rest of this 1,133-word original article along with everything else on the site every day, including the Data Cellar for just $9.99 per month or $115.88 per year. Click here for more details.