![]() |
![]() ALSO SPONSORED BY: ![]()
Wine Industry Insight |
![]() |
The long tangled litigation over the Sonoma Valley land and use permits belonging to the bankrupt Mobius Painter Winery & Cellars (see Part 1 here) has gotten hotter and messier with harsh accusations and legal filings in both Sonoma County Superior Court and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.
The current flurry of activity includes:
As previously described by Wine Industry Insight, the Mobius Painter story has become a lengthy saga worthy of a John Grisham thriller. In the interest of keeping articles as short and timely as possible, WII will present facts as a series of installments.
“DOUBLE ESCROW” LAND PURCHASE “FLIP” LEAVES $119,000 UNACCOUNTED FOR
According to transfer tax payments on deeds filed with the Sonoma County Recorder’s Office, Mobius Painter LLC, a limited liability corporation managed by Orange County businessman Bruce Halvax, purchased the land on Oct. 14, 1998 for $397,591.
The deed to a second sale of the same land, recorded at the same t1me (see time stamp) shows Mobius Painter LLC selling the parcel f0r $517,500.
The second page of the deed contains the names of the new owners. They are the same group of investors identified as “land owners” in the legal documents referenced in this article.
The double escrow “flip” resulted in a$119,909 gain, a 23-percent profit.
Halvax told WII in an email that “I never received any money on this transaction.”
The money remains, so far, unaccounted for.
Various court documents and investors involved with the transactions have blasted Halvax, saying that he did not disclose the “double escrow.” Halvax told WII that those involved should have done a better job with their due diligence.
LAND QUICKLY MORTGAGED – THIRD AND FOURTH TRUST DEEDS ISSUED
On April 26, 1999, Halvax, who managed the effort and owns 36.62% of the land, arranged loans from the Interstate Lumber Profit Share Plan of Scottsdale, AZ.
The Interstate loan was secured by a first deed. Bankruptcy Court documents show a claim from them for $220,696 secured by a second lien against the property. The first lien position is currently held by the Sonoma County Tax Collector for $155,775 in unpaid taxes.
Bankruptcy documents also show a third lien against the property to land owner Mary E Thielemeir to secure a loan listed at $82,930 and a fourth lien to another land owner, William Grimsley for a bankruptcy claim listed at $240,321.
LEGAL BATTLES BEGAN WHEN MONEY RAN OUT
Following the purchase, Halvax raised $480,938 from other investors to develop winery plans. Some investors told WII privately that they believed the amount was closer to $750,000, but those estimates are unconfirmed.
The process did not go smoothly. Halvax blamed the DotCom meltdown as a reason for failing to raise more money. At any rate, noted winemaker Brooks Painter — who had been brought in as the wine star — resigned from the company and returned all his equity on March 16, 2002.
Then, on Oct. 9, 2002, the “winery investors” sued Halvax in Orange County (Calif.) Superior Court, charging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and material omission in a securities transaction.
NEXT INSTALLMENT: Mobius Painter, Part 3: A White Knight, Another Fraud Lawsuit, Conspiracy Charge Over Land Transfer
Wine Industry Insight will follow court proceedings and keep readers informed. In addition, WII will — when time and breaking news allows — also provide a future installment on other details of the early transactions which were summarized in this and the previous article.